Which Spam Annoys you Most?
Sure, all spam is annoying -
that's inherent in its definition (unwanted commercial e-mail). But
all spam is not created equal, and some types are more annoying than
others. In fact, some types are downright infuriating.
It's a subjective matter, so
my nominations for "worst of the worst" may differ from yours. On my
husband's and my small business network, our server-based spam
filters catch literally thousands of spam messages per day. We never
see those unless we have reason to suspect a legitimate message has
been filtered and go wading through the quarantine folders on the
server. My client-side anti-spam program catches another hundred or
so. They're sent to a special "junk mail" folder that I can peruse
from inside my e-mail interface if I want.
That's a whole lotta filterin'
goin' on, but some spam still manages to sneak through, up to a
couple dozen per day. Most of them are a lot like the junk mail you
get in your snail mailbox: straightforward ads for software, loans
and other products and services. There's no need to open the
messages to know they're spam, since the subject line says something
like "Get XP, PhotoShop and Office cheap" or "The Best Online
Gambling Site" or "Get Ce1eb_rex here" or "Could you use an extra
$1000 a month" or something else that's clearly commercial. I can
quickly select all of these and do a mass delete, taking no more
than a few seconds of my time.
Slightly more annoying are
those that attempt to disguise their true nature but fail. You know,
the ones that say "Your order has shipped" or "here's the info you
requested" in the subject line. Usually a quick glance at the sender
address is enough to tell me that I didn't order anything or request
any info from that sender, and they, too, get zapped in one fell
swoop without my ever opening or previewing the message itself.
Then there are those that
could be legitimate messages. The ones that simply say "hi," or
"Introduction" or something similarly vague in the subject. If you
only correspond with a limited number of people using return
addresses you know, you could sort those out pretty easily, too.
However, as a writer, I get e-mail from readers, offers for work
from publishers and other legitimate messages from people I don't
already know all the time, so I often have to preview these
individually to find out if they're real or they're trying to sell
me Viagra. That starts to take time, and that annoys me a lot.
Because of the nature of my
work, I sometimes need to receive HTML mail, so I don't have that
blocked. Occasionally one of these messages with an ambiguous
subject line also turns out to contain a bandwidth-hogging full
color picture. Bad enough if it's a picture of some piece of
electronics gear they're trying to sell me. But ten times worse are
the rare times when it's a disgusting pornographic graphic.
Speaking of porn, even though
they're immediately recognizable for what they are, I also hate
those spam messages that contain a bunch of sexual language in the
subject line. Even though I never read the message itself, I feel
just a little bit assaulted by having to read the subject lines. And
what if I had young children who used my e-mail account?
However, the full color spam
that advertises porn sites probably doesn't do nearly as much damage
as the plain text ones that conjure up some make believe
relationship between the sender and recipient. You know, the ones
with subject lines like "Last night was fantastic - can't wait to
see you again." I often wonder how many spouses who aren't familiar
with the ways of the spammers see those messages in their husbands'
or wives' inboxes, resulting in all sorts of grief.
Of course, the spam scams
(such as "phishing" messages that purport to be from your bank or
credit card company and the multiplicity of variants on the tired
old Nigerian scam) also do real damage, mostly to Internet newbies
who fall for the frauds.
Then there are what I call
the "Outlook-sticking spams." These are messages that contain
external links or scripts or other components that cause your e-mail
client to freeze up completely and stop working. The only solution
is to shut down the program and open it back up, then delete the
message without previewing it.
With so many types of spam
bombarding my e-mail account and given the sheer volume these days,
I'm thankful for good filtering programs like iHateSpam. Without
them, e-mail would have been rendered unusable.
Let us know what you think.
Which type of spam gets your vote as "worst of the worst?" Do you
ever respond to spam messages, either in an attempt to get off the
lists or to actually buy products that sound appealing? Should
legislators, as some readers have suggested in the past, not only
make laws against sending spam but also make it illegal to purchase
from spammers? Or is that a violation of the whole concept of free
enterprise? Should certain types of spam be criminalized while
others aren't? Send us your opinions to dave_bytes@comcast.net